 |
| View in Web Browser | /_layouts/images/ichtmxls.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsx | 255 | | View in Web Browser | /_layouts/images/ichtmxls.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsb | 255 | | Snapshot in Excel | /_layouts/images/ewr134.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&Snapshot=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsx | 256 | | Snapshot in Excel | /_layouts/images/ewr134.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&Snapshot=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsb | 256 |
|
|
| View in Web Browser | /_layouts/images/ichtmxls.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsx | 255 | | View in Web Browser | /_layouts/images/ichtmxls.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsb | 255 | | Snapshot in Excel | /_layouts/images/ewr134.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&Snapshot=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsx | 256 | | Snapshot in Excel | /_layouts/images/ewr134.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&Snapshot=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsb | 256 |
|
|
| View in Web Browser | /_layouts/images/ichtmxls.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsx | 255 | | View in Web Browser | /_layouts/images/ichtmxls.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsb | 255 | | Snapshot in Excel | /_layouts/images/ewr134.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&Snapshot=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsx | 256 | | Snapshot in Excel | /_layouts/images/ewr134.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&Snapshot=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsb | 256 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enabling a New World of Work with Microsoft SharePoint products and technologies. |
3/31/2008 11:53 PMI will be attending the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco in a couple of weeks. For those of you interested in meeting/chatting with me, I'm planning to host an informal meetup (say, from 5-7PM) on one of the nights between April 21-24. I don't know which night yet since my schedule will likely be packed with meetings with customers and partners. Leave a comment here with your name and preferred meetup date, and I'll try to schedule something. And Sam, if you're reading this, I would love to meet you in person, so let me know your preferred date/time/place. Or, if there's already a party/meetup scheduled that you would like me to attend, just give me the details, and I'll definitely try to be there. And, no, this is not an April 1st joke. :-) 3/11/2008 6:13 PMWow, it's been almost 6 months since my previous blog entry! Rather than pontificate about SCB/E2.0 on my blog or elsewhere as if I know everything (I don't) about this rapidly evolving area of business computing, I've spent much of my time talking with customers and partners and working with our engineering teams to align our investments in social computing with business problems that customers and partners are trying to solve. There's still much work for me to do, but I will definitely try to blog more starting in April. There are so many exciting developments that I'd like to share with you! I'm posting this entry right now because I've had a large number of escalations directed towards me in the form of questions about specific technologies such as blog, wiki, tagging, social networking, etc. My default response has been, "What business problem(s) is your customer trying to solve?" It's a simple question to which most of the time the response is a much different inquiry than the initial question. So, if you're a Microsoft customer, when you push your Microsoft account team for answers about specific social computing functionality, please provide the context for what business problem(s) you're trying to solve, so I won't have to ask if/when your inquiry ultimately reaches me. :-) If you're not sure what types of business problems can be solved by social computing, take a look at this blog entry by Josh Bernoff of Forrester for some ideas. The other reason for this posting is to address the concern that some of our customers have about Microsoft "not doing enough" in the area of social computing for business. As I had alluded to above, we are doing a variety of very exciting things, but rather than announce and talk about them in a random or disjointed way, we will do so in a holistic and coordinated manner at the appropriate time. For now, I'd like to offer a metaphor that has resonated well with our customers and partners alike -- that is, the corporate enterprise market is Microsoft's kitchen, and Office is the bread while SharePoint is the butter that makes everything (not just the bread) better. We are deeply committed in helping our customers and partners maximize the investments that they've made with our bread and butter. I realize that it's tempting for some of you to consider the growing number of morsels to big chunks of cheese that other vendors may be offering in our kitchen. All I ask is that rather than rushing to take a bite of that cheese, you step back and take a careful look at the bigger picture to see if there's a mousetrap setup around that cheese. If you indeed have a critical need to get a "SharePoint Futures: Social Computing" briefing from us, please work with your Microsoft account team to coordinate it. I would love to discuss what business problem(s) you're trying to solve, and how SharePoint can be the solution. 9/13/2007 4:51 PM This article has been making its rounds today internally at Microsoft in several e-mail DLs, and I've received about a dozen e-mails from different people outside of Microsoft about the article.
What do I think? Well, first of all, I predicted this meme almost exactly a year ago on my blog here. :-) So, my answer to the question, “Will Microsoft become Facebook for the Enterprise?” is an emphatic “Yes! In the form of SharePoint (Server).”
I've been extremely busy and will continue to be slammed for the next month or so (you would know if you've been following my Facebook status updates), but I plan to post a series of blog entries about Social Computing for Business on the SharePoint Team Blog very soon. One of the main topic areas will be a deep dive into how Microsoft is using MOSS 2007 to enable Facebook like social networking functionality within its intranet, and what non-technical issues such as privacy, security, multilanguage, and diverse cultures had to be resolved.
The exciting stuff that we're planning for vNext will need to wait, but I promise that I will start blogging about all that at the appropriate time. 8/31/2007 3:16 AMVery interesting article in the Wall Street Journal about how "doctors, salesmen, and executives turn to new [social networking] sites to consult and commiserate with peers." In particular, I was particularly thrilled to see the following excerpt:
"This fall, for example, Reuters Group PLC is planning to launch a new social-networking service, tentatively named "Reuters Space," for fund managers, traders and analysts. For a fee, which hasn't yet been set, they will be able to log on to create profiles with industry-relevant information like their "asset class" and "instruments," check financial news feeds and ruminate about the industry on personal blogs. However, the Reuters service will only allow employees to join if their companies are Reuters customers. It also plans to allow companies to block certain features like blogging and to archive employees' online activities for compliance purposes."
Exactly why I'm thrilled about it will become obvious once the service launches later this year. J
8/16/2007 2:34 AMBlog entry: http://blog.hbs.edu/faculty/amcafee/index.php/faculty_amcafee_v3/comments/its_not_not_about_the_technology. The double negative is intentional because Andrew is essentially stating that "IT does indeed matter" when it comes to Social Computing for Business. Specifically, Andrew believes that "the IT toolkit available to help with collaboration, innovation, and knowledge sharing has recently become a great deal richer and better," and the debate between Andrew and Tom Davenport ( http://blog.hbs.edu/faculty/amcafee/index.php/faculty_amcafee_v3/watching_the_film_of_the_fight) centers on "the extent to which the E2.0 toolkit really is something new, or whether it's just an incremental extension to the longstanding set of technologies for collaboration, interaction, and information sharing." Tom stresses that there's nothing new ("companies have been deploying such tools for decades") while Andrew is emphatic about so much that is new ("digital platforms that initially impose little or no structure on interactions, but that contain mechanisms to let patterns and structure emerge over time, are actually quite new"). I believe that the reality is somewhere in between. :-) 8/16/2007 2:33 AM
I have the utmost respect for Tom Davenport, and I've been following his writings and teachings for over a decade. So, when he published a cynical piece ( http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/davenport/2007/03/why_enterprise_20_wont_transfo.html) about SCB back in March, I took the time to read it very carefully. Fortunately, he didn't say anything that conflicted with my belief that any significant and sustainable amount of organizational change requires more than just technology. According to Tom, "Most of the barriers that prevent knowledge from flowing freely in organizations – power differentials, lack of trust, missing incentives, unsupportive cultures, and the general busyness of employees today – won't be addressed or substantially changed by technology alone." Exactly! So, my recommendation to business managers and professionals is to leverage SCB capabilities to address some of these challenging and not-so-obvious issues before aggressively tackling the larger much-more-obvious business problems. 8/16/2007 2:31 AM
When someone actually needs to clarify that differences between Web 2.0, Enterprise Web 2.0, and Enterprise 2.0 ( http://blogs.jackbe.com/2007/06/differences-of-20s.html) because so many people are confused, all that 2.0 stuff is just badly named. Technology that enables organizational change and optimizes business productivity should not be named by technologist or technopundits. :-) If I had to chose one of the 2.0 monikers to compare to SCB, I'd say that Enterprise Web 2.0 would be the most analogous. However, if someone has to further explain ( http://blogs.jackbe.com/2007/06/differences-in-20s-continued.html) that Enterprise Web 2.0 is "a technology solution made up of Web 2.0, and Enterprise 2.0 is the organizational paradigm shift that leverages these solutions which, by EW2.0's very nature, must be deeply embedded in the organization to work, creating a much different 2.0 organization as a result." Huh? Contrast that to the 30 second elevator pitch I usually give for SCB, "Social Computing for Business is the natural evolution of Collaborate Computing tools, policies, and practices that have already been well established in many companies. SCB makes it easier and safer for more people to be connected, more knowledge to be captured and shared, and more innovation to be created within an organization." So, which would you pick? :-) 8/16/2007 2:28 AM
It's because ECM + SC = KM 2.0.
That is: Enteprise Content Management + Social Computing = Knowledge Management 2.0.
In my view, knowledge can only be effectively distilled into (and retrieved from) a combination of raw content (docs, plain o' data) plus metadata. Successful KM 1.0 solutions supported this combination very well but were extremely expensive to design and implement and even more expensive to maintain and nurture because as the amount of content/data grew exponentially over the past decade, the rigid metadata capabilities of these systems couldn't keep up with new ways by which users wanted to categorize or find the content. The limited number of true SMEs were overburdened because oftentimes they acted as the funnel/filter for what knowledge would be distilled into content+metadata. The viscious cycle caused KM 1.0 systems to gradually become out-of-date, irrelevant, and ultimately dormant/death. Social Computing features enable many more people to partake in the distillation, classification, rating (and other expressions of value), and discovery of knowledge.
The #1 business need on many BDM/TDM's minds is "Expertise Finding," for which I am suggesting is the ends while KM 2.0 (that's ECM + Social Computing -- with Search baked in) is the means. 8/16/2007 2:22 AM[Cross-posted from inside the FB walled garden, which currently doesn't provide a way to syndicate my Notes.]
Well, at least I wouldn't be paying as much attention to you as I would for the people in my FB friends list. And you wouldn't see most of the things (like this note) that I'm doing in FB, and I would gradually come to accept that .. as long as the people whom I want to be in my friends list are in it. If they're not, I'm motivated to add them as a friend, and if they're not signed up on FB, I would invite them. This is what doubles the network effect of Facebook! So, what happens when my friends list gets so big (like Scoble's) that the people on the list aren't much different from the general public? Well, for one thing, I won't let that happen since I manage my friends list and will not let it grow out of hand. I've already turned down several friend requests. Of course, the better solution is for FB to support custom groups within a friends list. One of my favorite FB apps is Blog Friends, which automatically filters my friends' blog entries (and their friends' blog entries) based on my keywords/interests. I've always wondered why Technorati never added this functionality. Too bad, because I'm using them less now that I spend more time reading blog entries that almost always interest me via the FB Blog Friends app. And time is the one thing that is finite, so the more time I spend on FB, the less I do on something else. 7/17/2007 1:26 PM
I love my BlackJack! Who needs an iPhone anyway? :-)
The 3G network is fast! I'm using my phone to surf the Web constantly now. And it's particularly handy for checking the frequent notifications that I get from Facebook, which I'm starting to get into quite a bit for both personal and professional reasons.
One thing that really annoys me about Facebook's e-mail notifications is that they don't contain any useful info except for a URL. I mean, if someone wrote on my wall, just show me what they wrote in the notification e-mail, so I don't have to login to Facebook! And why doesn't Facebook have a "Save password" or "Remember me" feature, so I won't have to relogin so often from the same computer?
Still, I have to admit that Facebook is fun and addictive, which makes it extremely viral/social. It's no wonder why more and more customers are asking me, "How can I implement a Facebook for my intranet?" Well, it's certainly possible with the My Site functionality in SharePoint Server 2007, which I blogged about almost a year ago here, but of course, it's difficult for any product's built-in features to be compared to Facebook, which is evolving and improving so rapidly.
Some companies (I can't disclose any names yet) are starting to enhance and extend My Sites to provide Facebook like social networking functionality, which I am very excited about. I'm also working with the SharePoint dev team to ensure that we squeeze in as many social computing features into vNext as possible. I hope to share my perspective on the key functional areas, on which we will "double-down" our investments, as well as areas on which we will not (and why not) in the near future. 1
- 10  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| View in Web Browser | /_layouts/images/ichtmxls.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsx | 255 | | View in Web Browser | /_layouts/images/ichtmxls.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsb | 255 | | Snapshot in Excel | /_layouts/images/ewr134.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&Snapshot=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsx | 256 | | Snapshot in Excel | /_layouts/images/ewr134.gif | /blogs/lliu/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&Snapshot=1 | 0x0 | 0x1 | FileType | xlsb | 256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|